Friday, October 3, 2025

The ‘big bad wolf’ fears the human ‘super predator’ – for good reason

 Facebook

Zanette with automated camera-speaker system. 

image: 

Western University professor Liana Zanette sets up an automated camera-speaker system.   

view more 

Credit: Michael Clinchy




Fear of the fabled ‘big bad wolf’ has dominated the public perception of wolves for millennia and strongly influences current debates concerning human-wildlife conflict. Humans both fear wolves and, perhaps more importantly, are concerned about wolves losing their fear of humans – because if they fear us, they avoid us and that offers protection.

A new Western University study shows that even where laws are in place to protect them, wolves fully fear the human ‘super predator.’

These findings by Western biology professor Liana Zanette – in collaboration with one of Europe’s leading wolf experts, Dries Kuijper from the Polish Academy of Sciences, and others – were published today in Current Biology.

Zanette and her colleagues conducted an unprecedented experiment across a vast 1,100 sq. km area in north-central Poland, demonstrating that wolves fully retain their fear of humans, even where laws exist to protect them. To conduct their experiment, the team deployed hidden, automated camera-speaker systems at the intersection of paths in the Tuchola Forest that, when triggered by an animal passing within a short distance (10 metres), filmed the response of the animal to hearing either humans speaking calmly in Polish, dogs barking or non-threatening controls (bird calls).

Wolves were more than twice as likely to run, and twice as fast to abandon the site, after hearing humans compared to control sounds (birds). The same was true of wolves’ prey (deer and wild boar).

By demonstrating experimentally that wolves fear humans, the study verifies that fear of humans, who are predominantly active in the daytime, forces wolves to restrict their activities to the night. Wolves were 4.9 times more nocturnal (active at night) than humans. In fact, wolves are not just nocturnal where Zanette and her team did their study, but everywhere humans are present, as shown in a recent continent-wide survey. This new experiment establishes that the reason is because wolves everywhere are fearful of humans.  

“Wolves are not exceptional in fearing humans – and they have good reason to fear us,” said Zanette, a renowned wildlife ecologist. “Global surveys show humans kill prey at much higher rates than other predators and kill large carnivores like wolves at on average nine times the rate they die naturally, making humans a ‘super predator.’”

Consistent with humanity’s unique lethality, growing experimental evidence from every inhabited continent demonstrates that wildlife worldwide, including other large carnivores like leopards, hyenas and cougars, fear the human ‘super predator’ above all else.

Legally protected but still fearful 

“Legal protection does not change wolves’ fear of humans because legal protection does not mean not killing wolves, it means not exterminating them. This is an important distinction,” said Zanette.

Humans remain very much a ‘super predator’ of wolves even where wolves are strictly protected, such as in the European Union, where humans legally and illegally kill wolves at seven times the rate they die naturally. France, for example, allows up to 20 per cent of the wolf population to be legally killed every year. Human killing of wolves in North America is comparable.

“At these rates, any truly fearless wolf that did not avoid humans would very soon be a dead wolf,” said Zanette.

Legal protection leading to fearless wolves – not scientifically supported

Wolves are now reoccupying areas in Europe and North America where they had been exterminated, leading to increased human-wolf encounters. This increase in encounters has been attributed to legal protection allowing the emergence of fearless wolves, but these new experimental results demonstrate this assumption is not scientifically supported.

“For wolves – like all creatures great and small – fear is primarily about food, specifically, how to avoid becoming food while trying to find food. Focusing on this fundamental risk-reward trade-off is critical,” said Zanette. “The certainty that wolves fear humans means we need to re-focus attention on what counterbalances this fear, rather than whether wolves are fearless.”

Humans are both uniquely lethal and unique in being normally surrounded by super-abundant, super high-quality food. Results of the study strongly indicate any apparently fearless wolf is actually a fearful wolf risking proximity to humans to get a bite of our ‘superfoods.’

The real problem, said Zanette, is how to keep the wolf from our human food.  

“The critical significance of our study lies in re-focusing the discourse on human-wolf conflict toward public education on food storage, garbage removal and livestock protection – reducing wolf access to human foodstuffs,” said Zanette. “What our study establishes is that there is no alternate problem to contend with. There is no ‘big bad wolf’ unafraid of the human ‘super predator.’”

Wednesday, October 1, 2025

Coyote populations surge, rebound quickly


New study reveals challenges associated with management of the predator

Peer-Reviewed Publication

University of Georgia

Trying to curb coyote populations may be a lost cause, according to a new University of Georgia study.

After careful counting of the animal across the Southeast, researchers found that Eastern coyote populations stabilize faster than they can be reduced.

“In general, predator populations are contentious to manage, but coyotes are a lot harder to manage than a lot of other predators due to their really unique, amazing ability to reproduce. They can bounce back very rapidly,” said Heather Gaya, corresponding author of the study and a postdoctoral research associate in the Warnell School of Forestry.

The analysis suggests a need for alternatives when it comes to habitat management and biodiversity.

Coyotes may be more prevalent in wooded areas than previously thought

Using cameras, categorizing different howls and other biological elements, researchers quantified coyotes per square mile in the Savannah River Site and beyond in South Carolina.

They found between 45 and 50 coyotes every 38 square miles. That’s more than one coyote per every square mile.

This finding was particularly surprising, the researchers said, because of where SRS is located. Coyotes typically favor open habitats, not forested areas.

“Coyotes have the ability to occupy and adapt to many different habitats, and SRS is apparently one that can sustain a lot of coyotes with enough prey and resources for a long time,” said Gino D’Angelo, co-author of the study and an associate professor in the Warnell School.

Part of what drives the coyotes’ success is low competition from other species and lots of available prey.

“For over 75 years, we didn’t have a lot of apex predators, so coyotes started to fill that void,” D’Angelo said. “We had naive prey populations not ready for a predator at such a high abundance. That can have real dire effects on populations that aren’t used to predatory pressure.”

Population control is costly, unsustainable

The study also included an 18-year analysis of coyote populations and how they changed over time.

Researchers found that despite repeated removal efforts over the years, coyote totals rebounded — and sometimes even spiked — shortly after.

Coyotes from neighboring states also made their way into areas with reduced coyote numbers.

These control methods cost $30,000 to $50,000. So the researchers recommended investing in other solutions. That could look like adjusting hunting regulations or enhancing habitats to support other species under continued coyote presence.

“The cost and man-hours that it takes to actively remove those coyotes is something that’s just not sustainable or not practical on a large scale,” Gaya said. “I think that when we’re managing coyotes, we have to consider if it’s worth it to put in all of that time and money for what seems to be short-term gain. And if we’re not able to sustain that in the long term, maybe we should be thinking about other options.”

This research was also co-authored by UGA alumnus Jordan Youngmann, an associate research scientist for the Odum School of Ecology, and Stacey Lance and John Kilgo.