Wednesday, August 30, 2023

Broken by bison, aspen saplings having a tough time in northern Yellowstone

 

A bison bull breaking aspen saplings and eating aspen in the Lamar Valley in northern Yellowstone National Park. Overstory aspen trees have died and fallen to the ground as seen in the photo, and tall saplings have grown since the early 2000s. Broken stem 

IMAGE: A BISON BULL BREAKING ASPEN SAPLINGS AND EATING ASPEN IN THE LAMAR VALLEY IN NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK. OVERSTORY ASPEN TREES HAVE DIED AND FALLEN TO THE GROUND AS SEEN IN THE PHOTO, AND TALL SAPLINGS HAVE GROWN SINCE THE EARLY 2000S. BROKEN STEMS OF ASPEN SAPLINGS ARE VISIBLE IN THE FOREGROUND, AND SILHOUETTED AGAINST THE BODY OF THE BISON (PHOTO BY LUKE PAINTER, 2020). THESE BROKEN STUMPS SHOW THAT SAPLINGS RECENTLY COVERED MUCH MORE OF THE STAND AREA, BUT THEY HAVE BEEN BROKEN AND KILLED BY BISON, AND BISON CONTINUE TO BREAK THE REMAINING SAPLINGS. THESE SAPLINGS WERE TALLER THAN 4 METERS, NO LONGER VULNERABLE TO SUPPRESSION BY ELK OR BISON EATING THEIR TOP BRANCHES, BUT BISON BROKE THEM OFF AT A LOW HEIGHT. view more 

CREDIT: A BISON BULL BREAKING ASPEN SAPLINGS AND EATING ASPEN IN THE LAMAR VALLEY IN NORTHERN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK. OVERSTORY ASPEN TREES HAVE DIED AND FALLEN TO THE GROUND AS SEEN IN THE PHOTO, AND TALL SAPLINGS HAVE GROWN SINCE THE EARLY 2000S. BROKEN STEMS OF ASPEN SAPLINGS ARE VISIBLE IN THE FOREGROUND, AND SILHOUETTED AGAINST THE BODY OF THE BISON (PHOTO BY LUKE PAINTER, 2020). THESE BROKEN STUMPS SHOW THAT SAPLINGS RECENTLY COVERED MUCH MORE OF THE STAND AREA, BUT THEY HAVE BEEN BROKEN AND KILLED BY BISON, AND BISON CONTINUE TO BREAK THE REMAINING SAPLINGS. THESE SAPLINGS WERE TALLER THAN 4 METERS, NO LONGER VULNERABLE TO SUPPRESSION BY ELK OR BISON EATING THEIR TOP BRANCHES, BUT BISON BROKE THEM OFF AT A LOW HEIGHT.

CORVALLIS, Ore. – In northern Yellowstone National Park, saplings of quaking aspen, an ecologically important tree in the American West, are being broken by a historically large bison herd, affecting the comeback of aspen from decades of over-browsing by elk.

Findings of the research led by Luke Painter of Oregon State University were published today in Ecology and Evolution.

The study comes five years after Painter, who teaches ecology and conservation in the OSU College of Agricultural Sciences, published a paper in Ecosphere showing that wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone had been a catalyst for aspen recovery both outside and inside park boundaries.

“I’ve studied the response of aspen in northern Yellowstone to the reduction in elk after the wolves were brought back and found that during this time, bison increased and have begun to affect aspen,” Painter said. “Now we’re showing strong evidence of a previously unreported behavior of bison bulls breaking aspen saplings.”

The saplings were tall enough to escape most browsing by elk and thus likely to grow into trees, but bison broke them off at a low height, he said. Other saplings were killed when bison scraped off the bark with their horns.

Quaking aspen largely reproduces by root sprouts, a process known as suckering, and stands of aspen are often a single organism connected by the trees’ common root system. Fire stimulates aspen reproduction from both roots and seeds.

For much of the 20th century, Painter said, aspen sprouts were unable to grow into trees because they were eaten by elk during winter. But at the end of the century, when wolves were reintroduced and the numbers of other large predators such as grizzly bears and cougars increased, elk numbers in the northern part of Yellowstone went down, bringing relief to the aspen.

“Some young aspen began growing into saplings – young trees taller than 2 meters – which was an indication they were no longer being consumed by elk and were likely to grow into mature trees,” Painter said. “It was a trophic cascade that changed the Yellowstone ecosystem, creating conditions that could bring it closer to what it was historically, with more aspen, willow and beaver, which depend on these plants. But the tremendous increase in bison over the last two decades has added a new turn to the story.”

Bison have long been known to have strong effects on their environment, Painter said. Among those is removing and suppressing shrubs and trees by eating, trampling and breaking them – and as bison numbers have greatly risen in northern Yellowstone in the last two decades, their effects on plants have also increased.

In places where bison are present in large numbers, like Yellowstone’s iconic Lamar Valley, they are hindering some aspen stands from replacing their dying trees, he said.

The Yellowstone bison herd is divided into central and northern herds, and this study was in the range of the northern herd. The northern herd’s numbers were generally less than 1,000 until 2005 and then increased, for reasons that aren’t fully understood, to about 4,000 during the last decade, Painter said.

Painter and OSU College of Forestry collaborators Robert Beschta and William Ripple examined a random sampling of plots in 87 randomly selected aspen stands, and 18% of saplings had been broken. They may resprout from their base, but the sapling height has been lost and new sprouts are vulnerable to being eaten by bison or other herbivores, the researchers note.

Multiple lines of evidence support attributing the breakage to bison, Painter said.

“Most broken saplings were in areas of high bison density and low elk density, and they were broken in summer when elk wouldn’t have been foraging on them,” he said. “Plus we directly observed bison breaking aspen saplings. The purpose of the behavior doesn’t seem to be about accessing food, and we observed only bulls engaging in this behavior, so it may be related to displays of aggression.”

Painter noted that Yellowstone bison are managed under an agreement with the state of Montana that requires them to remain in or very near the park – those that stray are killed, captured or hazed back into the park, in large part because they can carry bacteria that cause brucellosis, a threat to Montana’s cattle industry.

Elk also carry brucellosis and have passed it to cattle, but the same restrictions are not applied to them. Thus, unlike other wildlife bison are not allowed to disperse to other areas as their numbers and density increase.

The conservation of bison in Yellowstone, whose numbers plummeted nationally from over-hunting in the 1800s, is a big success story, Painter noted – and so is the recovery of aspen and other deciduous woody plants that began when the park’s large predators made their comeback.

“Thus, one important conservation goal is affecting another important conservation goal,” he said. “Researchers are only beginning to understand how these conservation goals have overlapped and affected each other. We reported a piece of this complex puzzle, describing and quantifying one way that bison shape their habitat by suppressing trees.”

The study was supported in part by the National Science Foundation and the Ecosystem Restoration Research Fund of the Oregon State University Foundation.

Friday, August 18, 2023

Gray wolf recovery is a success—is that a problem?

 

Peer-Reviewed Publication

AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES

Over the past 30 years, efforts to recover gray wolf populations in the United States have been broadly successful, with many regions now sporting robust populations of the charismatic carnivore. Writing in BioScience, wolf experts David E. Ausband and L. David Mech describe the conservation landscape and also the obstacles that wolves face as their populations expand into their historical ranges.

                "Remarkable wolf conservation success yields remarkable challenges," say the authors, as 6000 wolves now occupy habitat across 11 states. These growing populations now face significant threats as they attempt to colonize human-dominated areas, among them "fragmented habitats and barriers to dispersal, as well as increased encounters with humans, pets, and livestock."

                In response to those concerned about wolves’ potential impacts to prey populations and domestic livestock production, many jurisdictions have ramped up wolf efforts. For instance, in Wisconsin, "the legislature requires a public hunting or trapping season whenever wolves are delisted from the US Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) list of Endangered species." In contrast, wolves are seen as desirable in other areas, such as Colorado, where voters recently passed a ballot initiative to reintroduce them in the state. The authors caution that such pro-reintroduction initiatives, which may seem initially promising for wolves, could have the unintended consequence of setting precedent for laws barring reintroduction and thus complicate management. An uncertain regulatory regime, say Ausband and Mech, could cause major fluctuations in wolf populations, with dire consequences for conservation efforts.

                The answer to this quandary, the authors suggest, is thoughtful management that carefully considers the needs of diverse stakeholders: "Future wolf conservation in the United States will be affected by the ability of managers to predict colonization and dispersal dynamics, to reduce hybridization and disease transmission, to mitigate and deter wolf–livestock conflicts, to harvest wolves sustainably while satisfying diverse stakeholders, to avert a reduction in tolerance for wolves due to a disinterest in nature, and to engage diverse stakeholders in wolf conservation to avoid management by ballot initiative or legislative and judicial decrees." Only through such science-informed management, argue Ausband and Mech, can the present success of wolf conservation be built on in the future.

***

David E. Ausband is affiliated with the US Geological Survey’s Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, at the University of Idaho, in Moscow, Idaho, and L. David Mech is affiliated with the US Geological Survey’s Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, in Jamestown, North Dakota, and with the University of Minnesota in St. Paul.